USA Today reports the best large metro areas for young professionals are San Jose, California (114 employed single men for every 100 single women), Denver (101 for every 100) and San Diego (99 for every 100).Only two cities had more than 90 employed single women for every 100 available men: Racine, Wisconsin; and Lewiston, Maine."The Internet holds great promise for helping adults form healthy and supportive romantic partnerships, and those relationships are one of the best predictors of emotional and physical health," says Reis. Comparing dozens and sometimes hundreds of possible dates may encourage a "shopping" mentality in which people become judgmental and picky, focusing exclusively on a narrow set of criteria like attractiveness or interests.And corresponding by computer for weeks or months before meeting face-to-face has been shown to create unrealistic expectations, he says.'The graph shows the percentage of Americans who met their partners online as a function of the year they met.The data is adapted from a study by Michael Rosenfeld from Stanford University and Reuben Thomas from City College of New York and is based on a nationally representative sample of 3,009 partnered respondents.' Online Dating Growing in Popularity and Acceptance, But Matching Methods Lack Independent Validation, Finds Review Online dating has not only shed its stigma, it has surpassed all forms of matchmaking in the United States other than meeting through friends, according to a new analysis of research on the burgeoning relationship industry.The digital revolution in romance is a boon to lonely-hearters, providing greater and more convenient access to potential partners, reports the team of psychological scientists who prepared the review.
Census data on unmarried men and women ages 25 to 34 across America, and published a map of ratios between singles in more than 100 metro areas."Online dating is definitely a new and much needed twist on relationships," says Harry Reis, one of the five co-authors of the study and professor of psychology at the University of Rochester.Behavioral economics has shown that the dating market for singles in Western society is grossly inefficient, especially once individuals exit high school or college, he explains.Those percentages are likely even larger today, the authors write. Through the 1980s and into the 1990s, a stigma was associated with personal advertisements that initially extended to online dating. The authors caution that matching sites' emphasis on finding a perfect match, or soulmate, may encourage an unrealistic and destructive approach to relationships.But today, "online dating has entered the mainstream, and it is fast shedding any lingering social stigma," the authors write. "People with strong beliefs in romantic destiny (sometimes called soulmate beliefs) that a relationship between two people either is or is not 'meant to be' are especially likely to exit a romantic relationship when problems arise and to become vengeful in response to partner aggression when they feel insecure in the relationship," the authors write. Despite claims of using a "science-based" approach with sophisticated algorithm-based matching, the authors found "no published, peer-reviewed papers or Internet postings, for that matter that explained in sufficient detail the criteria used by dating sites for matching or for selecting which profiles a user gets to peruse." Instead, research touted by online sites is conducted in-house with study methods and data collection treated as proprietary secrets, and, therefore, not verifiable by outside parties.' " Along with Reis, other co-authors include Eli Finkel, associate professor of social psychology at Northwestern University and lead author on the paper; Paul Eastwick, assistant professor of psychology at Texas A&M University; Benjamin Karney, professor of psychology at the University of California at Los Angeles; and Susan Sprecher, professor of sociology and psychology at Illinois State University.We realize you have lots of choices to meet someone special, but if they really worked you would not be on line for years.The 64-page analysis reviews more than 400 psychology studies and public interest surveys, painting a full and fascinating picture of an industry that, according to one industry estimate, attracted 25 million unique users around the world in April 2011 alone.The report was commissioned by the Association for Psychological Science and will be published in the February edition of its journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest.Other highlights from the analysis include: Online dating has become the second-most-common way for couples to meet, behind only meeting through friends.According to research by Michael Rosenfeld from Stanford University and Reuben Thomas from City College of New York, in the early 1990s, less than 1 percent of the population met partners through printed personal advertisements or other commercial intermediaries.